<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New East Side BRT Plans Maintain Much of the Greenway Gap Status Quo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eastrivergreenway.org/2010/01/19/new-east-side-brt-plans-maintain-much-of-the-greenway-gap-status-quo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eastrivergreenway.org/2010/01/19/new-east-side-brt-plans-maintain-much-of-the-greenway-gap-status-quo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Has Bloomberg Lost his Eco-Transpo Mojo? &#124; Upper Green Side</title>
		<link>http://eastrivergreenway.org/2010/01/19/new-east-side-brt-plans-maintain-much-of-the-greenway-gap-status-quo/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Has Bloomberg Lost his Eco-Transpo Mojo? &#124; Upper Green Side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastrivergreenway.org/?p=462#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] forward yes, but nothing transportation advocates get very excited about. In fact, aside from a few disconnected protected bike lane segments that lack critical connectivity to become a real anchor of the bike network, there&#8217;s not much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] forward yes, but nothing transportation advocates get very excited about. In fact, aside from a few disconnected protected bike lane segments that lack critical connectivity to become a real anchor of the bike network, there&#8217;s not much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYC DOT Making the Rounds for Select Bus Service &#124; Upper Green Side</title>
		<link>http://eastrivergreenway.org/2010/01/19/new-east-side-brt-plans-maintain-much-of-the-greenway-gap-status-quo/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>NYC DOT Making the Rounds for Select Bus Service &#124; Upper Green Side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastrivergreenway.org/?p=462#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] Currently, DOT is NOT planning to include a protected bus lane for the  SBS corridor nor or they planning to include a protected cycle lane in Midtown (as ERGI touched on earlier). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Currently, DOT is NOT planning to include a protected bus lane for the  SBS corridor nor or they planning to include a protected cycle lane in Midtown (as ERGI touched on earlier). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOT to Roll Out SBS plans to East Side Community Boards</title>
		<link>http://eastrivergreenway.org/2010/01/19/new-east-side-brt-plans-maintain-much-of-the-greenway-gap-status-quo/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>DOT to Roll Out SBS plans to East Side Community Boards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastrivergreenway.org/?p=462#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] Currently, DOT is NOT planning to include a protected bus lane for the  SBS corridor nor or they planning to include a protected cycle lane in Midtown (as we touched on earlier). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Currently, DOT is NOT planning to include a protected bus lane for the  SBS corridor nor or they planning to include a protected cycle lane in Midtown (as we touched on earlier). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.726 seconds -->
